Smallpdf is a great general-purpose PDF toolkit. But its redaction tool applies a visual overlay, not content removal. Here is what that means for your documents.
Smallpdf is one of the most popular PDF tools on the internet — around 50 million monthly visits, a clean interface, and a comprehensive feature set covering compression, conversion, signing, and editing. If you need to convert a Word document to PDF or compress a file to email, it is an excellent choice.
PDF redaction is different. The technical requirement — permanently removing content from the document's internal data structures — is one of the harder problems in PDF tooling. Most general-purpose PDF platforms, including Smallpdf, implement it as visual masking. That is a meaningful distinction if the reason you are redacting is to ensure information cannot be recovered.
This comparison covers both tools honestly. Smallpdf is better in several ways; MyPDFBoy is better at the specific task of true redaction.
Smallpdf's redaction feature (available on their Pro plan at $12/month) draws a filled rectangle over the content you select. In the PDF file, this is stored as an annotation layer — a drawing element positioned above the original content.
The original text remains in the content stream underneath. Using pdftotext or any PDF text extractor on the output file will return the "redacted" content. In Adobe Reader, entering annotation edit mode may allow removal of the overlay rectangle.
Smallpdf is not alone in this approach. It is how the majority of general-purpose PDF editors implement their redaction features because it is significantly easier to build than true content removal.
MyPDFBoy uses PyMuPDF on the backend to perform content stream redaction. When you apply redaction zones:
The original content no longer exists in the file. pdftotext returns nothing for the redacted regions. There is no annotation layer to remove. The information is gone, not hidden.
| Feature | MyPDFBoy | Smallpdf |
|---|---|---|
| Redaction method | True content removal | Visual overlay (masking) |
| Text extractable after redaction | No | Yes |
| Annotation removable to reveal content | N/A | Yes (in some viewers) |
| Account required | No | Free tier: No; Pro: Yes |
| Price for redaction | Free | $12/month (Pro) |
| File size limit | Browser memory limit | 5GB (Pro) |
| Other PDF tools | Redaction + watermark only | 20+ tools (compress, convert, merge, sign, etc.) |
| File storage | None — processed in memory, not stored | Files stored 1 hour on free, longer on Pro |
| Upload to server | Yes (processed server-side, not stored) | Yes (stored on servers) |
| Browser-side processing | No | No |
| Verification method | Try to select text — nothing selects | N/A |
Smallpdf's privacy model: files are uploaded to their servers, processed, and stored temporarily (1 hour on free, until you delete on Pro). They use TLS in transit and AES encryption at rest. Their privacy policy covers GDPR compliance.
MyPDFBoy's privacy model: files are uploaded to the processing server, processed in memory, and the result is returned immediately. No file is written to disk. No copy is retained. No account exists, so there is no identity associated with any upload.
For most documents, either approach is fine. For documents that contain sensitive information — the kind of documents you are redacting — the distinction matters. Uploading a document containing SSNs, medical records, or legal strategy to a service that stores it for an hour is a risk most compliance frameworks would flag.
Neither model involves selling user data or using document content for purposes other than processing.
| MyPDFBoy | Smallpdf | |
|---|---|---|
| Redaction | Free | Pro only ($12/month or $108/year) |
| Access limit | None | 2 free tasks/day on free tier |
| Account required | No | Required for Pro |
| File history | No | Yes (Pro) |
Smallpdf's pricing is reasonable for teams that need a full PDF toolkit. If you need to merge, compress, convert, sign, and redact PDFs regularly, $12/month for a comprehensive platform is fair.
If you specifically need PDF redaction and privacy is a concern, paying $12/month for a tool that applies visual masking is worse value than using a free tool that performs true removal.
To be direct: Smallpdf is a better product for most PDF tasks.
If you use PDFs in a professional context and need a general-purpose toolkit, Smallpdf Pro is a good subscription.
For PDF redaction specifically:
pdftotextIf you need to redact a document and the information genuinely needs to be gone — legal filings, medical records, financial documents — use a tool that performs content stream removal. For that specific task, MyPDFBoy is the better choice.
If you need a comprehensive PDF platform for a team, Smallpdf Pro is worth considering — just use a different tool for anything that requires true redaction.
Try it free
True PDF redaction — content removed, not covered. Free, no account, no file storage.
PDF RedactionMost tools marketed as free PDF redaction apply visual overlays that leave content extractable. This guide covers which tools actually remove content from the file and which do not.
Adobe Acrobat's redaction is reliable but costs $20/month. Here are five free alternatives that actually remove content from the file, not just cover it up.
PDFs containing personal data fall under GDPR obligations. Here's what you need to know about redaction, retention, and the right to erasure for PDF documents.
We don't use cookies or track you. Your PDFs are processed in-memory and never stored. Privacy policy